This is the fourth post in a thread about explicit New Testament statements pertaining to Christ's divinity. The thread has been spread across other posts, so if you need to see the progression of thought, then please recap first here (introduction) and then here (Thomas' declaration to Jesus), then here ("He says: Your throne O God", part 1). This constitutes a new "sub-chapter" I am adding to my paper, Trinitarian Interpretations, which I initially published August 2015. So let's buckle up and look at the Hebrews 1 passage over the remaining two posts...
Elohim possibilities
We are assuming that “God” in Hebrews 1:8 (Psalm 45:5), is
not the same one referred to as “God” in Hebrews 1:9 (Psalm 45:7), but how does
that work if Christians and Jews are all monotheists? There surely can’t
possibly be more than one Elohim, Theos,
God, or whatever language you want to use! This modern way of looking at
ancient perceptions of the supernatural realm is disintegrating in theological circles
(see also chapter 2, monotheism), in favour of a more hierarchical perspective.
There is only one supreme God – for the Israelites, this is Yahweh: He created
everything and no-one can be compared to him. He is an Elohim. And there are other Elohim. Michael Heiser
sets out Elohim into 6 types:
1. Yahweh, the God of Israel (thousands of times—e.g., Genesis 2:4–5; Deuteronomy 4:35)
2. The members of Yahweh’s council (Psalms 82:1,6)
4. Demons (Hebrew: shedim—Deuteronomy 32:17)
5. The deceased Samuel (1 Samuel 28:13)
6. Angels or the Angel of Yahweh (Genesis 35:7)
This list is initially quite striking, but hard-core
monotheists confronted with such strong textual evidence might still want to
emphasise that there is a difference between Elohim referring to gods (plural)
and Elohim referring to the singular God, synonymous with Yahweh (e.g. Psalms
82:1,6). I too was struck by that possibility, but that was still the influence
of my modern evangelical world-view (and English translation[2])
skewing my interpretation.
Even in its plural form applied to a singular being, Elohim can
be applied descriptively to another
singular being. Judges 8:33-34 is a clear example of this: the people
replace their God (Elohim), Yahweh, making Baal-Berith
their God (Elohim). The Israelites also re-assign the works and status of Elohim
Yahweh to the Elohim of the golden calf (see Exodus 32). These biblical cases
inform us that within a hierarchical system, the one at the top qualifies for
plural status.
Thus far we have established that options for understanding
Elohim can be plural OR singular, and can refer to Yahweh or NOT to Yahweh.
That is significant. But what of human kings – can a human king be referred to as Elohim? But regarding human bearers
of the title, we need to refer back at this point to scholars on the Hebrew of
Psalm 45 at this point.
Donald Hagner, commenting Hebrews 1, states: “The king originally in view was an Israelite
monarch, but so glorious are the words
spoken to him that their ultimate fulfilment can only be in the messianic
king, the son of David … [there is] a difficulty
of understanding the original historical context wherein a king of Israel is
addressed as God. The latter difficulty can be explained as hyperbole for the king who functions as
God’s representative in his office.”[3]
Constable, for whom Christ just is God in Hebrews 1:8,
agrees with this exegetical option for the Psalm used by the Hebrews writer: “the writer
addressed his human king as “God” (Elohim). He did not mean that the king was God but that he stood in the place of
God and represented Him”.[4]
Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Peter H. Davids, F.F. Bruce and Manfred T.
Brauch also agree: “The king was not
regarded as the incarnation of deity. Rather, he was “Yahweh’s anointed and
served as the Lord’s deputy on Earth”.[5]
I don’t know how you read Hagner, but he does not appear
totally coherent to me. On the one hand we have glorious hyperbole denoting
God’s representative, while on the other it could not be making sense without a
future fulfilment necessary. Views about Old Testament prophecy vary. Mine is
very basic: it made sense[6].
However it was reinterpreted later (by the Hebrews writer for instance), it
already made sense then. Furthermore, whatever that sense was must not be presumed absent from the later, first century,
author’s mind either. But is this the only instance of Elohim applied to humans? Heiser also reminds us that the revived
spirit of Samuel was Elohim too, but he takes it no further, despite the fact that
one of his foundational understandings of the Biblical picture of humanity is that
of being “imagers” of God. So human imagers of God in this Elohim puzzle has to
be developed – we can’t stop at a strange, murky corner of the canon on Samuel’s
spirit.
1. Exodus
4:16: He will speak to the people for you, and it will be as if
he were your mouth and as if you were God (Elohim) to him. The speaker is Yahweh, the “he” is Aaron, Moses’
brother, and the “you” is Moses, needing a lot of reassurance about
confronting the Egyptian authorities. Notice this “as if you were God”. Exodus
4:16 gives us concrete scope that when addressing a later leader of Israel, the
Psalmist of Psalm 45 could certainly have the same idea.
2. Exodus
21:6; 22:8-9: We will not lose time quoting these passages, but you
can check the context – here the Elohim
are almost certainly human judges, not God or gods, but exercising a task
with delegated authority from the divine realm, and ultimately from Yahweh
Himself.
3. Deuteronomy
3:24: Sovereign LORD,
you have begun to show to your servant your greatness and your strong hand. For
what god is there in heaven or on earth who can do the deeds and mighty
works you do? Throughout the Bible, we have these two great realms
represented – the spiritual unseen realm and the Earth realm, both of which are
populated and organised. That is why Jesus teaches his disciples to pray to the
Father, saying: May your will be done here on Earth as it is in Heaven. The other Elohim in Heaven and the Elohim on
Earth are not comparable in greatness or love to Yahweh; but it pre-supposes
their existence: they are impressive, authoritative and noticeable authorities
in both spheres.
4. Psalm 45:2,6-7: You are the most excellent of
men […] Your throne [O] God will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice
will be the scepter of your kingdom […] God your God has set you above your
companions[7].
Assuming that this Psalm is not saying “Your throne is God”, this key passage
for Hebrews 1 interpretation is also a key component to understanding the
biblical picture of how humans can be bearers of the Elohim image.
Please click here to see my take on the Hebrews 1:8 assumptions. Thank you.
[1] Judges 8:33-34 is my addition to the sample references
provided by Heiser, I think even more striking than Judges 11:24. Here I believe
NIV make a mistake in applying the lower-case “g”. It should read: They set up Baal-Berith as their God, that is to say that, within a
henotheistic framework, Baal-Berith is set up as occupying the place of God (of
gods) that is actually Yahweh’s by right.
[2] The fact that a translation of the plural form of Elohim as singular God, god, spirit when
not referring to Yahweh is not criticised – I simply note it to as a
contributing factor to my uninformed view.
[3] Hagner, p.
34
[4] Thomas L. Constable, Notes on Psalms, 2016 Edition, p. 233, available in PDF form and
updated at www.soniclight.com. These
notes are those adjoining the NET Bible study notes.
[5] Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Peter H. Davids,
F.F. Bruce and Manfred T. Brauch, Hard
Sayings of the Bible, p. 270-271, Intervarsity
Press, Illinois, 2009.
[6] Assuming no textual corruptions.
[7] The use of capitals here is to simulate the Hebrew and
remove interpretative bias through capitalisation (or non-capitalisation) of
certain Gs.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks very much for your feedback, really appreciate the interaction.